BONJOUR!
What follows is an open letter I sent to my fellow parents of the 2023 Team Canada Jr roller derby players. Did I mention I am the parent of a Team Canada Jr roller derby player? Y'all, the last blog post here is EIGHT YEARS ago.
Things have happened.
If you are curious about said Team Canada Jr roller derby player, my dottir of many names, you can find:
Rennie's Instagram here
Buy my Team Canada Jr skater a croissant here
____________________________________________________
This open letter was written For Parents by A Parent, to facilitate understanding of the roles of officials in derby, and address some questions and comments I have received while officiating junior games over the past six months of preparation.
For myself, I have been officiating on and off since 2012-ish (you can check the archives here, it probably has that information) and became much more intentional in 2019 when dottir Rennie was rostered on the 2020 Team Canada Jr. I thought it would be lovely to be able to earn my keep as I accompanied Rennie to Worlds.
As it all happened, 2020 was cancelled, and now 2023 is here and Rennie and I are both off to France to participate in the Junior World Cup July 28-30. Rennie as a player and myself as an official.But here is the open letter now, for those parents, grandparents, assorted family and friends who will be watching their loved one compete in a sport on an international stage they barely are cognizant of before a couple months ago. Roller derby is a strategically and tactically wild ride and very much about the skaters. We do not make it easy for spectators. Perhaps this can shine a little light on what the heck the referees are doing.
DISCLAIMER BEFORE THE DISCLAIMER: I am leaving the original letter more or less as I wrote it in May 2023, it is a document that exists in a certain time and towards a particular audience, and I reserve the right to change my mind, realize and clarify mistakes and to double down on any opinion I may have expressed below. Who knows how I will feel in a year, but for now, this seems like a reasonable and instructional document. Thank you for joining me here.
*****************************************************************************
What follows is an introductory discussion of how roller derby referees go about officiating a game of roller derby. This is not about roller derby rules per se, but how officials see the game and the role they play, given from the perspective of a parent who is also a referee, junior coach and player. The goal is to clarify the game structure and officiating for parents* of skaters and share the foundation of game structure and the enforcement of fair game play. Please note that these are my words and understanding and not in any endorsed by WFTDA or JRDA. If you stridently disagree with anything here, you can definitely let me know – one time, with respect – but this is my personal reflections shared for educational purposes and the final say on absolutely nothing.
It is a very good idea for all parents alongside their young athletes to
familiarize themselves with the rulebook and, equally important, the casebook. Not every aspect of the rules will be of
equal importance to know as a player and as someone who supports that player,
but look around and get to know the language and structure of the rules. Review in small portions at a time but make
it regular part of the roller derby experience.
Travelling to derby is one excellent time to crack open the casebook and
read through a couple of examples.
First thing to know is that roller derby is an ever – and rapidly – changing
sport. Roller Derby of 2010ish, when I attended
my first practice, had a spirit that feels similar to today in its grassroots,
community minded inclusivity but also so different in that it had strong ties
to counter culture and distinctly appreciative of the more performative aspects. See the primacy of nom de guerres, or
tough/saucy derby names. In 2010, all
defense was one-on-one. There were no walls,
never mind tripod defense. It was skate fast and take wild swings at each other. Rockabilly, fishnets, and knee socks were only
just starting to slip away as the primary aesthetic of roller derby but the
afterparty was still the main thing. There
was plenty of athleticism and passion for the sport but, admittedly, it wasn’t
a very good place for junior skaters.
Since then, roller derby has gone through a terrific number
of gameplay and rules evolutions, become smarter, more skilled, more
strategic. Still plenty of tattoos and
derby names, but as skaters and parents we are proud to bring our children to
derby, to feel like we are a positive influence on young athletes. Roller derby as a sport exists with a core
value of inclusion and growth, which reflects in its changing rule sets and
culture. We have grown to not just
recognize the intrinsic power and skills the youth are bringing, but to value
them as equal participants in the evolution of the sport. In fact, the youth are now leading the
direction roller derby is taking.
In that spirit, JRDA rules are WFTDA rules plus a little bit
more. Over the past two decades, the WFTDA
rules have changed from being a punitive system of ‘Do This, Don’t Do That’ to officiating
being ‘Impact’ based. I would like to
talk more about what impact means to officials in a moment. But first, a brief overview of the structure of
a level 3 game (being a discussion with Team Canada parents, it’s best to stay
focused here).
Over all, it’s very good to remember that officials are there to oversee the framework
of the game, the flow and ensure that it happens fairly, with safety and
respect to all involved. Skating
officials and NSOs define the game time, the start and end, keep the time, the
score, see that both teams are abiding by the rules of roller derby. Officials mind the flow of the game and time,
the personal safety and dignity of all involved. There are many aspects to officiating, but we
will be focusing today on the most visible and probably, misunderstood, part of
a referee’s job: issuing penalties.
In particular any game there are, ideally, seven skating
officials. Each jammer on track has a personal
JAM REFEREE companion that follows them about counting points (again, penalties
are only one task amongst many), two INSIDE PACK REFEREES that define the pack
structure and observe the game from inside and three OUTSIDE PACK REFEREES (who
supply the inside and jam refs with information and oversee gameplay on the far
side of the track where inside officials cannot see). Each referee has tasks singular to their
position and view the game from a specific point of view. Any ref can make any call (mostly) but they
are positioned as such that they better suited to see some types of actions (and
infractions) better than others. This
means teamwork and consistent standards between refs is important, since they
have to rely on one another to monitor the entire game. Officials
use systems of communication between each other both standardized by the rules calls,
verbal cues, whistles, hand signals and more informal systems of gestures,
sharing quick words and, sometimes, meaningful glances.
Before a ref will call penalty, they will be reasonably confident that they saw
the beginning, middle and end of the action.
Putting a skater in the box, particularly a jammer, can change a game
and officials need to be certain that a penalty is warranted. An action that an official does not feel they
have enough information about can have their working information supplemented
by another official who did have eyes on the action. By the nature of the game, however, referees
do not often have time to have a consultation with one another over thousands
of physical player interactions that take place over the course of a single
game. Obviously, there will be some
actions that will have more impact on the game than others, and these ones are
important for coaches and players to consider – did the action take place over
a length of track, was the action rotational or happened towards the center of
the track, with bodies potentially obscuring the view from any single
official? This is one good use of an
official review, in that it brings the officials together to discuss what they
witnessed, and the piecing together of a complex action may might be done. At that point the action can be assessed for
legality and if any penalty (or removal of a penalty) is warranted.
If you see a zebra huddle right after a big action, especially an injury, you
can be reasonably sure they are checking with each other to ensure they are in
agreeance in what happened. Any
penalties determined to be relevant will be issued at that point, before the
next jam begins.
A quick note about penalties issued between jams: a referee
will not blow a whistle to issue an early or late hit, or a call coming in
after the four whistles. The penalty
whistle would confuse and disrupt the game flow. Typically, the official will get a skater’s
attention, verbalize colour, number and penalty with accompanying hand
signals. Skater will need to report to
the box immediately.
Penalties basically come in three flavours:
Illegal contact:
either by blocking an illegal contact zone like the back or lower leg, or by
using an illegal blocking zone like the lower leg or forearm. Also includes multiplayers or being out of
play, out of bounds when contact is made.
Basically, somebody did something physically that affected fair game
play. JRDA further binds contact with
skill-based levelled play.
Illegal procedure:
an area where advantage is gained outside of the game boundaries, including the
physical track boundary (such as cut tracks) and the dynamic boundaries and
structures like the pack (which changes continuously but with it, literally,
roller derby cannot happen), the number and types of players on the track and
time. This includes breaking the pack,
failing to make a pack when there is none, being in the wrong spot when the jam
starts (false start, not in bounds) and anything that interferes with the game
flow.**
Unsporting Conduct:
or misconduct, in which the safety and respect of all participants in the game
(includes skaters, bench staff, officials, volunteers and spectators –
basically anybody in the venue) is taken into consideration. These penalties do not need to done with
intention, such as often an insubordination call when a player fails to leave
the track directly and immediately when issued a penalty (resulting in a whole
minute in the box). Other penalties
include that which come from contact that is considered unexpected and/or
especially hazardous in roller derby, such as leaping contact (example, the
apex jump into opposing players***), or aggressive, threatening or hostile
language directed towards an individual or generally considered to lack respect
for the sport. JRDA rules are very clear
that disrespectful behavior from non-player participants is included here and
can result in penalized skaters. Check
the JRDA Code of Conduct for specifics, as it is applicable to all in
attendance including spectators. Some spectator
behaviors normalized in other sports is not acceptable at JRDA events (this
includes profanity and cheering that includes directives to harm other skaters,
such as Get Them, Hit Them, and the such.
Penalties are mainly called by referees but a Non-Skating
Official penalty box manager can issue a misconduct to a skater who enter the
box in an unsafe manner, putting box officials in danger or distracting them
from effectively performing their job.
Considering Impact: Is it actually a penalty?
I am going to narrow the discussion down to contact penalties for the moment,
since this is an area that seems to generate the most confusion during the game
as to why penalties are Not issued.
First, contact to an illegal target zone or with an illegal blocking
zone not in itself cause enough to result in a penalty. The existence of forearms touching opposing
players and moments where players have linked their arms are not singularly to
be judged as something to important enough to send a player to the box. The illegal action must have Impact on the
game. A quick imperfect guideline is,
was the illegal action successful? Did
it have an impact in the game?
Impact is not just sort of a personal judgement by officials, the criteria is
defined as illegal contact that puts an opponent significantly off balance, out
of bounds, changes their direction or speed, OR allows the skater who made
contact to stay in bounds or upright when they would have gone out or down
otherwise (think grabbing an opposing player’s jersey to stop oneself from
falling).
Impact assessment does not stop at the players involved in
the initial action however, it also includes any teammate who gained advantage
through the use of an illegal action.
There are some very good examples of this in the casebook and all of this is
best clarified by in person discussion.
In writing right now I could either go on for days or just summarize by
saying: read the casebook. OR, if the
timing is right, ask a ref.
Discretion/Metrics
Although Impact as a criteria has a defined meaning, referee discretion is an
important part of modern officiating. It
is an ongoing discussion and by no means an uncontroversial one (there are
other roller derby organizations with different rulesets that do not allow
impact to be a factor), but with the WFTDA asks that an illegal action be
impactful before being penalized (with some safety exceptions) and is up to the
official’s assessment if Impact was observed.
There is much to talk about here and I would be happy to discuss in
person, but generally the main thrust is for officials to educate themselves
and other officials, and gain tons of experience, on the use of discretion on
whether to call a penalty in favour of allowing gameplay to flow as smoothly as
possible.
Refs back in the day were discouraged from studying strategy, thinking that not
seeing the intention more objective, but the opposite is true now. Refs are encouraged to go to practices, study
the sport, understand the strategies the teams are attempting. This greater depth of understandings allows
them to focus on the appropriate areas and better understand what they are
looking at. A brilliant thing is Not
making a call on a player using their upper arms (legal blocking zone), for
instance, even though their forearm (illegal blocking zone) is close to the
action. Roller derby continues to
progress this way, when officials do not automatically penalize novel
strategies and techniques. This doesn’t
mean that refs gloss over illegal actions, it means that sufficient impact
needs to be observed because over penalizing normal roller derby action and
constantly sending players to the box for illegal actions that do not overly
affect the game is not desirable.
Officials allow roller derby to happen, they do not attempt to overly control
or penalize it.
Which is to bring up yet another important aspect to being a referee, and
especially working with other referees, is that each official has their own
Metric for deciding what is roller derby and what is not. For instance, inside pack refs - who define
the pack - it’s easy to see when an official has a spongier metric than one who
uses a tighter one. Since the action
cannot be stopped to bring a tape measure out and the pack measured, each
individual official has their best understanding of how far 10 feet is and that
is their personal metric. The important
thing for the players involved is that the metric applied by the official is
consistent so they can make adjustments within any single game and feel that it
is being applied to both teams equally.
Personal metrics exist for all referees, because human, and the best
attempts at fairness and consistency is made.
Who
are these refs anyway?
For crews that are made up of refs from different places, and do not work with
each other all the time, these individual metrics will be a point of verbal
discussion and exploration amongst each other before and during the game. The idea is for all officials to bring their
own personal metric to be closer to medium of the whole crew so there is an
overall consistency.
For worlds, the crews will remain together throughout the event, so that they
can get to know each other, learn each other’s communications, and tighten up
their own crew metric and understanding.
The crew being consistent and confident in each other is important for
your tournament organizers and the head officials involved. In fact, the crews are already introduced to
one another, and are sharing personal information about their credentials and,
most importantly, pictures of their pets.
Much thought and intention is being given to the officiating at worlds,
all the planning, discussions, training, preparation that can be done. The skaters will be in the best hands
possible.
Which brings us to the official who actually has and firmly upholds a very
different understanding of an aspect of the game than the rest of the crew. Sometimes officials are wrong about something
and it is appropriate to question it. However,
adjustments are not as simple as telling an official to do it different. Small variations in metrics or even incorrect
calls may not be noticed by officials because of the different positioning and
distinctive areas of responsibility. In
a high level game, if I the ref am busy trying to monitor another official’s
performance, I stand a chance of not taking care of my job, thereby compounding
a situation and putting players at additional risk. By the nature of the game, someone outside of
the working officiating crew may need to notice what is happening and there is
standard and respectful protocols for doing so.
Officials are aware that they make mistakes despite best efforts,
because human, and they are highly attuned to the fact that that their actions
are under great scrutiny. Trust me, we
are given performance reviews often. Official
reviews, the 30 seconds between jams, the captain’s meetings before, middle and
end of game are all opportunities teams have to bring up officiating concerns. Some games are lucky enough to have an
alternate official who can observe the overall officiating and gameplay and
bring specific issues, better seen from outside, to the working officials.
Before I leave this section, I just want to point out one more aspect of the
unique viewpoint and impact that is not immediately evident to spectators or
players. While the audience sees what is
happening of course, the proximity to the action is important to be able to help
define who started it and where it landed. Bodies are better doors than windows, and the
line between a clean hit and a back block is not easily defined sometimes, even
among officials. Or there is another
body in the action behind that is obscured from the front. The errant skate that causes a fall. It takes a good view clear view and officials
spend a lot of time making sure they are in the right place to see the contact. Which does not mean the outside viewer is
wrong, just that there may be more factors in play that is hidden from them.
Late
calls
A penalty can be issued at any point during the jam and up until the start of
the next jam, which means the call being made might not be directly connected
to action taking place. That is a
frustrating situation for a skater and an official can help clarify
understanding by adding ‘late call’ to their verbal call, but that does not
always happen. Why a penalty may come
late has a variety of reasons, sometimes official need a moment to put it
together, not wanting to make kneejerk calls or they needed a moment to check
with another ref to be fully confident on the call. The game allows officials to take that time
if they require. Sometimes players do novel
things that take time to process. Sometimes
a player makes a move so brazen and wild that an official can doubt their own
reality. Did that just happen?! These skaters are so very skilled and
powerful. They do amazing things and innovate
on the spot. It is far better to give
the officials the time to check their understanding than to demand they make a
decision immediately. Fewer penalties,
better roller derby.
Which is to say that officials put much thought, training, experience and a heavy
feeling of responsibility to make sure things are safe, fair, and
enjoyable. I encourage all spectators,
coaches and parents of skaters to also make a habit of also engaging in that
reflective process, especially when speaking to junior athletes about their
games, and criticisms of the officiating is made. I do hope everyone (except the officials) gets
to cheer and yell during a game. This is
supposed to be fun. Questioning and analyzing the officiating is part of
it. Respectfully.
Refs are and should be open to scrutiny, they are not above critique, they make
mistakes, they sometimes make bad calls, or they have a bad day. Feedback to officials is a regular and
necessary part of the game structure for just this reason. It’s also true that some errors can not be
fixed in a single game and may take some time after, officiating
education. Just as no one skater shows
up on the first day knowing everything, same for officials. With patience and understanding we can keep
games moving, keep everyone safe, gaining experience, and have continue to
evolve this sport.
On a similar vein, refs have much they can speak on about
the game and have valuable unique insight into skater’s gameplay. If any skater has questions, they can approach
an official after the game and ask questions.
At this stage, I encourage going through or with the coaches to approach
an official. An official in stripes has
some structure protocols of behavior so do not be offput by seemingly distant
language, but all officials are there because they LOVE this sport and want to
support the skaters. They are there
making gameplay safe and fair and no official operates with intention to frustrate
or punish a skater. There may be a
disagreement on the specifics of a skill or play, but that is conversation that
goes both ways.
Myself and other parent/officials will be available this Calgary weekend to
field questions and discusses whatever. We
are friendly people who have seen things.
If anyone likes we can set a formal time for a Q and A and address the
million or so things I decided to omit because this was long enough, or just go
ahead whenever and ask. We will make time.
As parents, we are highly invested in the success of these specific skaters and
the Canadian teams, obviously, and feeling frustrated or confused with
officiating is not a good use of anyone’s time and energy. I also think that the more one understands
about the game - the structures, rules, what the ref signals mean - the more
enjoyable spectating is. Knowing how the
refs work will help everyone focus on what actually matters: the athletes and
cheering them on.
-Mal
* A ‘parent’ here is meant to be any
parent, guardian, junior coach or influential adult in a junior skater’s life
that will be speaking in a meaningful sense with the skater about a game.
**Sometimes, such as when a team simply fails to show up at
the start of the jam, no one specific skater can be deemed responsible, so the
team captain will serve a penalty as a blocker for the team. JRDA also has some modifications here,
allowing level one skaters accommodations regarding pack definition,
recognizing that skill level and avoiding contact is an important criteria for
levelled play.
***All these potentials are penalized with the same 30
seconds in the box, but some penalties can be elevated into an expulsion (being
removed from the game) if they are deemed especially dangerous or
unsporting. The one I see most often is
an apex or straipex jump that makes uninitiated contact with an opponent’s
illegal target zone (head, feet, back), meaning the skater’s jump resulted in
contact with an opposing skater that did not move into their position during
the jump (indicating that they were not intending to initiate contact or block
the jumper). The contact does not need
to have knocked down the skater as leaping contact is considered unsporting
(rules say a skate must be on the ground to initiate contact) and impacts to
heads and back are considered dangerous.
The safety of all skaters is of upmost importance. Please know that no expulsion happens without
a discussion with the officials and the head referee is the only one who can
make the final call. This is an
excellent area to spend some times looking at the rules and chatting informally
with officials about, as not wanting to punish apex jumping – a beloved aspect
of our sport – but also needing to consider safety is an ongoing discussion at
large.